Tim Daws
Sep 26, 2024
AI content generation is convenient in saving time, money, and resources. However, misinformed, inaccurate, and error-prone content is like deceiving the reader. For this reason, Google rolled out an update that encouraged bloggers and content creators to publish well-researched and easy-to-read articles for past indexing on SERP.
So, how do these search engines find out that the published content is AI-written?
It is through specific detection models that AI is spotted with precision. Individuals can also look for traces of AI using tools like Copyleaks before adding articles or blogs to their websites.
But are these tools accurate?
Find out in our detailed Copyleaks review.
Real customers have experienced several issues while scanning their content via Copyleaks. One prominent concern was that it did not indicate what percentage of the text was AI-generated. Moreover, removing even a single word from the article or essay triggered AI detection upon re-scan.
Why is this the case? We have the answer here.
Students and bloggers with non-native backgrounds often use Grammarly and other suggestive AI tools to polish their content. This was the norm before the inception of AI content generators like ChatGPT.
However, now AI detection tools like Copyleaks sweep all traces of AI under the same rug. It doesn’t discriminate. So, if even a tiny amount of editing is done using Grammarly, then your content will likely be considered AI.
One user had this to say about this tool and why it always detects content as AI.
“Copyleaks lacks reliability and should not be marketed as an “AI” detector. When a story summary exhibits close similarities, Copyleaks erroneously labels it as “AI,” whereas it more accurately falls within the realm of unintentional plagiarism. Claiming to be “reliable” and “trustworthy” is deceptive advertising, misrepresenting the tool’s true capabilities and accuracy.”
Anything above 75% is considered a good AI score. It indicates that a small portion of the content is adjusted via Grammarly or similar adjustment tools and that about a third of the text is completely written by a human.
Before jumping to the accuracy part of the tool, it is vital to understand what Copyleaks is and what it has to offer.
Copyleaks is an AI authentication tool that checks plagiarism and traces of AI in content. It is a comprehensive suite of tools that ensure that your content is original and error-free. The tool offers free access to features on a limited scale once you create an account.
Copyleaks is a multifunctional tool that ensures your content, whether it be text or code, is authentic and error-free. Here are the features accessible on the platform.
AI Detector Function of Copyleaks
As the name suggests, this feature checks traces of AI writing in a text. The free version only highlights the AI content and gives its verdict on whether the passage is human-written or not. If you want a thorough score or result, a subscription is necessary.
Plagiarism Checker Function of Copyleaks
This feature helps check if the content is copied or not. It can identify plagiarism across several languages. However, it is not available for free. You can request a demo by providing some information to Copyleaks.
Codeleaks
Since the inception of AI-generative services, software engineers have effectively created code for their projects to save time. However, overreliance can cause licensing issues. This is where this feature comes in handy. With it, you can detect AI-generated code and flag it for plagiarism. It is also unavailable for free.
Writing Assistant
With it, you can generate content that is error-free and in your preferred tone. Moreover, the text will avoid any AI detection, saving time and resources.
The Copyleaks model is extensively trained using countless texts that have allowed it to understand human writing patterns and what separates it from something written by an AI tool.
Similarly, the plagiarism detector scans through a vast database of articles, academic papers, and websites to verify if the entered text is original.
Is Copyleaks reliable? They definitely claim to be. Here, we have reviewed their self-assessment and what the old users of the service have to say.
Copyleaks claims that it is the perfect AI-powered solution to bring authenticity to your text and code. It offers features that can help with plagiarism and AI due to extensive training by scanning trillions of content.
The tool also states that it can check traces of AI in content generated by the latest GPT4o model. On the website, it claims an accuracy of 99%, which may seem a tad exaggerated.
Copyleaks underperformed on Trustpilot; about 42% of the 191 reviews had only a 1-star rating. The average score was 3.4, an underwhelming indicator that it isn’t a reliable service.
One user was frustrated with the AI result.
“I just spent one minute and 46 seconds going into this site and writing this review. I should say time well spent because this just CopyLeaks just sucks. I’m probably gonna sue for false advertisement, them stating that it’s 99% accurate, it’s not. I got an AI detection once in my essay, which I know that I didn’t use AI for. I fiddled around a little with the text, and with that, I mean removing a sentence, I apparently got cleared for any AI.”
Another customer suggested that students and teachers stay away from this tool.
“This tool is incorrect 99% of the time. First, it gives you accurate detection for a few times. Then, it flags your content as AI all the time. The same texts got different AI detection results. Dear Copyleaks, don’t you understand that false AI detection can impact a lot of important things, from work to study? Please stop your unethical way of doing business. Just tell customers to pay from the start; don’t give free credits just to make false detection and scam us into paying.”
The positive reviews were not detailed enough. Most only wrote how excellent the service was, and none gave the reason behind the nod of approval. On other review sites like Capterra and GetApp, Copyleaks had a better score of 4.4, where users praised that it was easy to use and offered cost-effective plans.
“Copyleaks has been crucial for allowing me to grade not only with blatant plagiarism in mind but also with revision in mind! I use Copyleaks to check for both plagiarism and the amount of change my students make from one iteration of a paper to the next. Both have been invaluable to me as an educator in the writing field! Without this service, my grading would take considerably longer, so I am grateful to Copyleaks for having the necessary tools.”
User reviews can influence your decision, but we decided to test the service for ourselves to check if it can accurately detect AI in your content.
First, we scanned an AI-generated essay on World History on Copyleaks. It detected and highlighted AI content in all of the entered text. In this regard, Copyleaks was completely accurate:
AI Score : AI content was detected by Copyleaks.
Next, we scanned an article written by our staff without any influence of Grammarly or other AI tools. No trace of AI was spotted by Copyleaks, and we got a nod of approval from its AI detector.
AI Score : The text was human-written.
Are other tools as accurate as Copyleaks? We scanned both the AI-generated text and human-written article using the following tools to compare the results. Check them out!
You can use GPTZero for free to check for AI in the content. It supports up to 15,000 characters in the free plan. The Pro package starts at $9.99 per month, and with it, you can scan up to 100,000 characters.
We scanned the same content written by a human(our staff member) on this platform and received a positive score of only 1.06%, meaning the text was original.
AI Score of ZeroGPT for AI-Generated Content : 1.06% of the text was AI.
The tool detected AI in almost all of the content, ensuring it was accurate.
AI Score of Turnitin for Human-Written Content : 99.46% of the text was AI.
Here is the comparison table.
| Tools | ZeroGPT | ZeroGPT |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 1.06% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 99.46% |
Turnitin is the preferred AI and plagiarism detector for academics and students, ensuring their content is original. In our case, the tool accurately declared the article to be human-written.
AI Score of Turnitin for Human-Written Content : 0 of the text was AI%
The tool detected AI in almost all of the content, ensuring it was accurate.
AI Score of Turnitin for AI-Generated Content : 100% of the text was AI.
Here is the comparison table.
| Tools | Copyleaks | Turnitin |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 0% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
GPTZero offers its services at $15 per month via the Essential package. The Premium plan is available at $24, and the Professional plan comes at $35 per month.
Moreover, you can scan content up to 5,000 characters for free. Still, this package is insufficient to detect AI in a whole essay or article. The human-written content we scanned on the platform only detected 2% AI, which was a positive result.
AI Score of GPTZero for Human-Written Content : 2% of the text was AI-written.
We also scanned an article written by ChatGPT on GPTZero and got a 100% AI score, compared to ZeroGPT, which gave the same content a 99.08% AI rating.
AI Score of GPTZero for AI-Generated Content : The entire content was 100% AI-written.
Check out the following table for a quick overview of the results.
| Tools | ZeroGPT | Turnitin |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 2% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
You can scan 5,000 words for free without creating an account on WRITER. It is easy to use and cost-effective.
AI Score for WRITER for Human Content : It detected only 3% AI in our passage.
However, the AI content was inaccurate. Instead of detecting the majority of text as AI, it only detected 32%.
AI Score for WRITER for AI-Generated Content : The content had an inaccurate score of 32% AI.
Check out the following table.
| Tools | Copyleaks | WRITER |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 3% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 32% |
Sapling detected AI in our human-written passage, which was crafted from scratch without the influence of Grammarly or other AI tools.
AI Score for Sapling for Human Content : The tool detected 25.1% AI.
The detection in this scenario was accurate as the AI content did not get past Sapling’s detector.
AI Score for Sapling for AI-Generated Content : The content was 100% AI.
Here is the table to check the output scores.
| Tools | Copyleaks | Sapling |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 25.1% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
You can scan only 2,500 characters for free on Content at Scale. However, it is fairly accurate, and the pricing plans are not too expensive. It passed our human-written content and spotted no traces of AI.
AI Score for Content at Scale for Human Content : The content was passed as Human-Written.
Content at Scale spotted AI in the ChatGPT content accurately.
AI Score for Content at Scale for AI-Generated Content : The content got flagged as AI-written.
Check out the following table.
| Tools | ZeroGPT | Content at Scale |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | Original |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | AI Content |
Crossplag offers 10 credits upon creating a free account that can scan up to 1,000 words. However, according to our results, this tool is not worth the purchase as it falsely detected AI in our human-written content.
AI Score for Crossplag for Human Content : The tool spotted 100% AI.
However, in ChatGPT’s content case, the tool was accurate.
AI Score for Crossplag for AI-Generated Content : The content was 100% AI.
Here is the comparison table.
| Tools | ZeroGPT | Crossplag |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 100% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
This tool is advanced and extremely accurate. Even a slight preposition adjustment via Grammarly can not bypass it. We tested this claim and got the results according to them.
AI Score for Originality for Human Content : There was no AI in our content according to Originality.
Originality accurately predicted AI in all of the content.
AI Score for Originality for AI-Generated Content : The content was 100% AI.
Check out the table.
| Tools | ZeroGPT | Originality |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 0% | 0% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
Now that we know that Copyleaks AI detector is accurate and quite useful, the next step is verifying the accuracy of its plagiarism detection feature. Follow this section to learn the results and our findings.
Copyleaks plagiarism detection tool is not accessible for free. If you run a business or represent an educational institute, then you can request a demo. However, you must use a business email address for that.
The feature alone is accessible at $10.99 per month. You can check alternative tools to test plagiarism, and we have tested their efficacy in this section. Read on!
Are other plagiarism detection tools as accurate as Copyleaks? We tested the top ones here.
We published our article on a third-party website and scanned the text to see if Grammarly could spot it. Indeed it did! The tool not only shared the link for the post but also provided how much of the text was plagiarized.
Plagiarism Score by Grammarly : The score was 62%.
This tool can scan 1000 words of content for free. We checked the same article to see if it could spot plagiarism, and after a few minutes, it gave an 82% unique score, which was inaccurate.
Plagiarism Score by Plagiarism Detector : The score was 18%.
This tool allows checking up to 500 words for free for plagiarism. It detected 53% copying in the text and also shared the link where the article was published. Given the limited word count, we had to scan, this score was accurate.
Plagiarism Score by Quetext : The score was 53%.
This tool also allows up to 1,000 words for free to verify if the text is plagiarized or not. We scanned the article and got affirmation from SmallSEOTools about where it was published.
Plagiarism Score by SmallSEOTools : The score was 53%.
This tool can also check 1,000 words for free. Though it did spot where the article was published, the score was inaccurate. It only detected 17% plagiarism.
Plagiarism Score by Quetext : The score was 83%.
Here is the table of the pricing plans of Copyleaks.
| Plan | Price | Credits | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI + Plagiarism Detection | $16.99/mo | Up to 100 |
|
| Plagiarism Detector | $10.99/mo | Up to 100 |
|
| AI Detector | $9.99/mo | Up to 100 |
|
Follow this section for additional information about Copyleaks and how to manage your account.
Just log in to your account, access the Billing section, and hit the cancellation tab to initiate the process.
Copyleaks report is accessible to premium users. It displays additional information on the AI and plagiarism spotted in the entered text.
Turnitin is a much more reliable and professional tool compared to Copyleaks.
According to our tests, Copyleaks offers accurate results and can be trusted.
If there is an influence of tools like Grammarly, then it can trigger AI detection. However, the majority of the time, Copyleaks is accurate and isn’t lying.
Teachers mostly use Turnitin compared to Copyleaks.
Based on the features, testing, and analyses, these are the pros and cons of Copyleaks
Free AI Detection – You can scan your articles or essays to check for traces of AI. There is no word count limit. However, the tool won’t show a detailed report; it will only display the verdict and highlight the sections that might be AI-generated.
Accurate – Our testing proved that Copyleaks was accurate to a fault and did not indicate errors or other issues.
Limited Feature Availablity With Free Plan – Accessories like plagiarism checker and other tools are not accessible with the Free plan. You are required to purchase the service.
Low Rating on Trustpilot – It hasn’t had the general public’s confidence on review sites; many customers have shared concerns about accuracy.
If you are short of time and have AI-generated content to publish but do not wish to face any penalties, consequences, or AI detection, then there is a way to do it via a content humanizer tool like TextGo AI.
This intuitive tool will polish your content and rewrite it, making it impossible for all advanced AI-detection tools like Copyleaks to spot anything. It is easy to use and allows up to 2,000 words in one go.
Not much preparation is needed to avoid AI detection; we presume you will have content generated via a tool like ChatGPT. So, instead of scanning it directly via Copyleaks, we recommend humanizing it first via TextGo AI.
With an AI detection tool like TextGo AI, you can easily bypass all the top AI detection tools online. Your content won’t be flagged as AI, even if you have generated it via ChatGPT, Gemini, or similar platforms.
Here is what TextGo AI has to offer.
The steps are as follows.
Step 1.Add Input Text
Go to the official TextGo AI website and enter your text.
Step 2.Humanize the Content
Click the HUMANIZE button and let TextGo AI start the processing.
Step 3.Copy The Humanized Content
Once TextGo AI humanizes the text, click the Copy button to add the text to the clipboard so that you can publish it anywhere you want.
Besides, you can scan the text on Copyleaks to verify if the content can bypass detection or not. Moreover, it is capable of avoiding AI detection from notable tools, including Turnitin, Originality, ZeroGPT, GPTZero, and more.
You can also discover the AI score with TextGo’s instant AI detection feature. It is highly accurate compared to other notable tools.
TextGo takes and removes all the elements that enable AI detection tools to spot AI patterns, like watermarks and generic linguistic characteristics. Afterward, it rewrites the original text in a tone and format that resembles what was written by a human. The content won’t have any generic or robotic tone that triggers detection.
The best thing about Copyleaks is it is free to use and allows complete essays and articles to be scanned for AI. It is also reasonably easy to use. Moreover, its other features are quite accurate, but they are only accessible to paid users.
However, users have complained about its accuracy. Though we did not spot any issues, AI technology is continuously evolving, and such problems could be related to bugs or pending updates.
Copyleaks should offer free users access to its other features as well, even at a limited capacity.
This ends our Copyleaks review. It is accurate and quite useful for non-professional users like students to check if their content has any AI. However, you can bypass AI detection on such tools by humanizing your AI content via TextGo AI. It is a quick and easy process.