Tim Daws
Sep 26, 2024
Nowadays, AI content detection reports are vital to ensure that your article, report, or blog is original and authentic. However, the market is flooded with ineffective tools that present with false flags.
Is Sapling AI one of them?
We have tested the tool in complete detail. Follow this Sapling review to verify its accuracy and features.
Sarah, an experienced content creator, faced an unexpected challenge. Her latest article submission, a heartfelt piece she crafted for a prominent blog, was flagged for AI-generated content, leaving her incredibly frustrated and bewildered.
However, being a professional, she could not just sit down and worry. She needed a solution to prove her authenticity.
Sarah discovered Sapling’s free AI Detector, a tool recommended by fellow writers. With a few clicks, it provided a thorough analysis, confirming her work was genuinely human-written. This reassurance not only salvaged her article but also reinforced her credibility with the client. Sarah’s trust in Sapling grew, knowing it could safeguard her reputation in the future.
This Sapling review will check whether the tool is really worth the money!
Several professional writers like Sarah have been encountering similar issues, making tools like Sapling invaluable.
Besides the AI detector, Sapling AI offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed to assist writers, editors, and businesses in maintaining content quality and authenticity. Check the list below.
Sapling Suggest
This tool offers response suggestions in real time. This way, the support staff or the company representatives can address customer inquiries quickly and efficiently.
Sapling AI Grammar Checker
Sapling claims this tool is 60% more efficient than its competitors. It can correct spelling, grammar, and style errors in your content. Plus, it is free.
Autocomplete Everywhere
This time-saving function finishes texts for you. It offers deep learning-powered autocomplete suggestions across messaging platforms. This way, you can rewrite, improve formality, and adjust the tone of your writing.
Sapling Rephrase
This tool is pretty similar to Autocomplete, but it also stretches the utility across CRMs. You can get LLM-powered paraphrase suggestions to bypass your writer’s block. Plus, you can adjust the tone, which will ensure your communication is on par with the brand.
Sapling AI Detector is a specialized tool designed to identify and analyze AI-generated content. Its key features include the following.
The primary use of the Sapling AI Detector is to maintain the integrity of written content, particularly in professional and academic settings where originality is paramount. It analyzes text for patterns and markers typically associated with AI-generated content.
We generated two essays using ChatGPT Pro and tested the AI detection score on the Sapling AI detector.
Check out the scores here.
We scanned a how-to article on the platform and received a positive score of 99.96% original.
Sapling AI Score for AI-Generated Content: The content was 100% fake.
Surprisingly, Sapling detected that one-fourth of our submitted informational article was AI-generated. This was a false flag.
Sapling AI Score for AI-Generated Content: The content was 99.3% fake.
Here is the summary of the results.
| Type of Content | Sapling AI Detection In AI-Written Content |
|---|---|
| Round 1 | 100% |
| Round 2 | 99.3% |
Sapling is easy to use. Just paste the content or upload the file to the web interface, and it will automatically detect whether your text is fake or original.
We tested two human-written articles without any influence of AI tools like Grammarly or Sapling Grammar to check the accuracy of the platform.
The results are as follows.
We scanned a how-to article on the platform and received a positive score of 99.96% original.
Sapling AI Score for Human Content: The content was declared only 0.4% fake.
Surprisingly, Sapling detected that one-fourth of our submitted informational article was AI-generated. This was a false flag.
Sapling AI Score for Human Content: The content was flagged as 25.1% fake.
| Type of Content | Sapling AI Detection In Human-Written Content |
|---|---|
| Round 1 | 0.4% |
| Round 2 | 25.1% |
Is Sapling’s AI detection tool better than the renowned platforms available online? We have tested their effectiveness and accuracy here. Read on!
ZeroGPT was the pioneer tool for detecting AI content when OpenAI first launched ChatGPT. It is known to be highly accurate and accessible for free, allowing users to scan 15,000 characters without any cost. It did not spot any AI in our hand-written article.
ZeroGPT did not spot any AI in the article written by our staff. This rating was better than Sapling, which detected 25.1% AI in the human content.
AI Score of ZeroGPT for Human Content:0% of the content was AI-generated.
ZeroGPT’s rating was almost similar to Sapling’s for the AI-generated essay. It gave a 99.08% score.
AI Score of ZeroGPT for AI-Generated Content:99.08% of the text was AI-written.
Here is the table.
| Tools | Sapling | ZeroGPT |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 0% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 99.08% |
Turnitin is regarded as the best tools to detect plagiarism and AI in academic content. We tested this theory for our how-to article and essay. For human content, it did not detect AI, which was spot on!
AI Score of Turnitin for Human Content:The content was 0% AI.
It accurately indicated that ChatGPT’s article was completely AI. This score was identical to what Sapling provided.
AI Score of Turnitin for AI-Generated Content:The content was 100% AI.
Here are the results.
| Tools | Sapling | Turnitin |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 0% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
This handy tool offers AI detection for free, but you can not find out what percentage of the content was flagged. To get the detailed report, Copyleaks offers 100 credits per month for $16.99.
The tool did not spot any AI in our human-written content.
AI Score of Copyleaks for Human Content:The content was 0% AI.
It was accurate as well while checking the ChatGPT article. The score was 100% fake.
AI Score for Copyleaks for AI-Generated Content:The content was 100% AI.
The results are shared here.
| Tools | Sapling | Copyleaks |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 0% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
It is pretty similar to ZeroGPT but only offers a 5,000-character scan for free. However, it lacked the accuracy of the competitor. Still, it showed better results than Sapling.
AI Score GPTZero for Human-Written Content: The content was 3% AI.
As for the AI-generated article, GPTZero declared that the entire passage was AI.
AI Score for GPTZero for AI-Generated Content:The content was 100% AI.
Here are the results.
| Tools | Sapling | GPTZero |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 3% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
WRITER is a free tool that allows users to scan 5,000 words in one go without even creating an account. Compared to Sapling, its score for AI detection in the human-written content was pretty similar.
AI Score for Sapling for Human Content:The content was 3% AI.
The AI score for the ChatGPT article was a bit inaccurate compared to Sapling. The text was flagged as 67% original.
AI Score for Sapling for AI-Generated Content:The content was 33% AI.
Check the results in the table below.
| Tools | Sapling | WRITER |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 3% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 33% |
Content at Scale can only process 2,500 characters worth of content in one sitting, and it does not share a score of AI detection as well. It merely shares a judgment on whether the passage is human-written or not. Still, it highlights the AI in the sentences. It is available starting at $49 monthly. Our human-written article passed as original on the platform.
AI Score for Content at Scale for Human Content:The content passed as human-written.
As expected, almost the entire ChatGPT article was identified as AI.
AI Score for Content at Scale for AI-Generated Content:The content was AI-written.
Check this table for comparison.
| Tools | Sapling | Content at Scale |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | Original |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | AI Content |
The tool offers 10 credits for free, which implies that you can scan 1,000 words without purchasing the paid plans. The package starts at 9.95 Euros. However, you may not want to empty your wallets just yet, as the tool was not accurate. It flagged our human-written(original) article as 100% AI.
AI Score for Crossplag for Human Content:The content was 100% AI.
However, it detected AI in the AI-generated article as well. So, the jury is still out on the efficacy of this platform.
AI Score for Crossplag for AI-Generated Content:The content was 100% AI.
Here is the comparison table.
| Tools | Sapling | Crossplag |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 100% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
Originality AI is one of the strictest tools for detecting AI. However, it is not free and thus is recommended only for professionals and businesses. Still, it is accurate as it did not spot any AI in our human-written content.
It is available for $30, which offers 3,000 credits. Each credit covers about 100 words.
AI Score for Originality for Human Content: The content was 0% AI.
As expected, the ChatGPT content did not bypass this tool. The whole text was flagged as AI.
AI Score for Originality for AI-Generated Content:The content was 100% AI.
Check the results here.
| Tools | Sapling | Originality AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI Detection Score in Human-Written Content | 25.1% | 0% |
| AI Detection Score in AI-Written Content | 100% | 100% |
Sapling’s AI detection tool is available for free. However, this plan only offers to scan 450 tokens per process, which is roughly 2,000 characters. To scan longer text, you may need to purchase the Pro package, which is suited for professional writers.
Businesses should look into the Enterprise package, which offers much more suitable add-ons.
Check out the table below to learn more about its pricing plans.
| Plan | Cost | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | ● $0/month | ● Basic suggestions
● 2,000 characters per process ● Use of five domains ● AES-256 and TLS (HTTPS) encryption ● 20 Snippets |
| Pro | ● $25/month ● $12 / month (annual) | ● Basic suggestions
● Use of five domains ● AES-256 and TLS (HTTPS) encryption ● Unlimited snippets ● Advanced premium suggestions ● Autocomplete Everywhere ● Rephrase ● Unlimited use of premium domains ● Email & ticket support ● AI detector (longer queries) ● Chat assist (Suggest) ● Conversational insights |
| Enterprise | ● Custom pricing | ● Includes all Pro features
● Domain administration ● Team analytics ● Dedicated support contact Bulk user provisioning ● Advanced security actions ● Self-hosted ● Custom integrations ● Single Sign-On / SCM ● API (separate usage-based plan) |
We ourselves were unsatisfied with Sapling’s accuracy in detecting AI in human-written content. One user on AcademicHelp resonated with our assessment and gave the tool a 15 out of 30 score.
Here is what the user had to say!
“Sapling’s AI detector presents a unique case where it identifies all types of texts as fully AI-generated, including those written entirely by humans. While this demonstrates a high sensitivity to potential AI-written content, it raises concerns about accuracy and false positives. The tool’s inability to discern human-written text (scoring 0 out of 10 in accuracy for human text) could be a significant drawback for users seeking nuanced detection capabilities.”
Another user was not content with their pricing plans.
“Sapling offers free and paid plans, with the free version allowing up to 2000 characters. Its PRO plan is priced at $25 per month, and there’s an enterprise option with customized pricing. However, the lack of discounts and loyalty programs, combined with its limited detection capabilities and over-sensitive algorithm, might make users question its value for money. Although we believe the inclusion of MS Word integration and a Chrome browser extension does add some appeal to its pricing plans.”
Here are the pros and cons of using Sapling’s AI detection tool.
Free – For students and non-professional users, it is a useful tool to check AI in their content without any cost.
Instant Detection – The tool instantly detects AI in the content. You only have to upload the file or paste the text on the web interface.
Multiplatform Support – The tool also offers a web extension, enabling users to check AI in their content quickly.
No Value for Money - The pricing plans are expensive, and there are no discounts or loyalty programs to incentivize potential customers.
Accuracy Issues – Sapling is consistently inaccurate in detecting AI. Not only us but also other users face similar challenges.
If your client or supervisor requires you to pass Sapling’s AI detection and you are unable to find any solution, then check out this section.
Some businesses, clients, or teachers require you to show proof that your content is AI-free. They may ask you to provide a report using Sapling since it is free.
However, the Sapling AI checker is grossly inaccurate, and there is a high chance that you might be unable to bypass the tool.
This situation may be troublesome and time-consuming. Still, there is a way to get around Sapling’s AI detection.
You can use an AI humanizer tool to rewrite your content that has been flagged as AI by Sapling. However, with so many tools claiming to offer results, it is easy to get tricked by a fake platform.
We recommend TextGo AI, which is the most accurate and advanced AI humanizer tool, capable of bypassing not only Sapling’s AI detection but also other platforms, including Turnitin, Originality, etc.
Here are its features.
Instant AI Detection
Once you input the content for rewriting, TextGo will provide the AI score for both the original and output text.
Content Humanizing in Multiple Languages
TextGo supports more than 80 languages and can bypass AI detection while maintaining the format and theme of the original text. It lets you process 2,000 words in one go, ensuring there are no spelling or grammar errors.
The steps to utilize TextGo’s bypassing tool are easy to learn. Check them out.
It is pretty easy to use TextGo AI. The steps are as follows:
Step 1. Add The Input Text
Visit the official website of TextGo AI. Input the original text that was flagged as AI by Sapling.
Step 2. Humanize The AI Content
Click the Humanize tab after the content has been added to the web interface.
Step 3. Copy The Humanized Content
The tool will display the AI score for both original and humanized text. Once you are satisfied with the outcome, click the Copy button to add the content to the clipboard.
We took the human-written article that got Sapling AI detection of 25.1% AI and tried the TextGo Humanizer tool. The content that was rewritten by the AI bypasser was then pasted on Sapling’s website.
After a few minutes, we verified that almost 100% of the humanized text was rated original by Sapling. This attested to the fact that TextGo AI is the best and most authentic AI humanizer for writing a passage.
Follow these FAQs for more information on Sapling AI.
Sapling AI detector offers reasonable AI ratings for a free tool. Though paid users shared their concerns regarding the accuracy, we did find it useful.
Yes, Sapling supports and covers more than 100 languages.
Yes, you can only scan 2,000 characters in one process using the free version of Sapling AI.
On the official website, click the Content button. There, the support email will be visible. You can ping them there.
This ends our Sapling review. The tool is easy to use, but the accuracy leaves a lot to be desired. Still, you can bypass its accurate or inaccurate AI detection by humanizing your content via TextGo AI. The bypasser is easy to use and lets you rewrite an entire passage in one go.