Ryan Michaels
Sep 21, 2024
AI detection is a pain for writers, researchers, and students who want to save time and utilize the technology of platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and others.
However, getting their content detected as AI ends up consuming more time than if they had written it themselves.
These concerns have opened room for AI content humanizing tools that can rewrite the passages into a tone and format as if a human had written it. However, most of these services are ineffective and do not work.
Today, we will share our WriteHuman reviews, explaining what this tool offers and whether it truly bypasses AI detectors.
Much like any other content humanizing tool, WriteHuman also claims to turn AI passages generated by services like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc, into text as if it was written by a human.
The service states that it can bypass the top AI detectors, such as Turnitin, ZeroGPT, and even advanced tools like Originality AI. However, the platform only claims that it makes the text a bit refined and sets it up to sound more human. It doesn’t guarantee it.
Is WriteHuman AI capable of bypassing AI tools to make the content human-written while keeping the text logical and well-formatted? Read the whole review to learn more.
WriteHuman offers two main features for writers, students, and bloggers to manage content and bypass AI detection.
This feature claims to eliminate AI tracking and bypass AI detection, leaving out all traces of GPT content. WriteHuman says it can bypass the standard tools like Turnitin and ZeroGPT. Once the content is generated, WriteHuman also shares the Human Score(AI Detection rating).
In addition, the Enhanced Model, which is only available with paid plans, can bypass the most advanced Originality 3.0 tool. This mode changes the robotic and one-dimensional AI content into a subtle text that carries logic and is formatted professionally.
You can also customize the tone of how you would want your humanized content to look like. The tool currently offers eight tones, including Standard, Professional, Academic, Blog, Casual, Creative, Scientific, and Technical.
With WriteHuman at your disposal, there is no need to go elsewhere or purchase any separate AI detection tool. It offers the AI Detection tool for free, which can distinguish AI-created content with precision, saving time and resources.
Here is our assessment of the WriteHuman’s interface and different features.
The web interface is user-friendly. It works smoothly and doesn’t take any time to load the homepage. The features are easily accessible and straightforward to navigate. Users with no technical backgrounds can effortlessly manage their content settings to generate human-like text.
However, during the sign-up process, we tried creating an account using a ProtonMail email address, which took several minutes to finish. We waited for 30-odd minutes to receive the verification email. When we signed up via Gmail, the email was instantly received.
There is no “Content Reset” button. You are required to refresh the webpage using the browser to scan new content or remove the existing text manually to enter the next one, which is a bit time-consuming.
The content generated using the AI Humanizer feature was well-formatted and logical to a large degree. It was also easily understandable.
However, there were a few punctuation mistakes and other grammar errors. Still, the content received a decent score of 82 on Grammarly.
WriteHuman actively claims to bypass AI content on the following platforms. We tested this theory by first generating a complete essay via ChatGPT 4o, humanizing the text on WriteHuman, and scanning it via the mentioned tools.
We got the following results.
Turnitin is the go-to tool for educators to check whether their students have submitted AI-generated assignments or homework. It can also detect AI content for all types of texts, such as blogs, press releases, etc.
However, it is not accessible for free, and only academics or institutes can use this tool to check for plagiarism and AI in a content. We managed to check its accuracy, and it did not give WriteHuman a free pass. AI was detected in some section of the passage rewritten by WriteHuman.
GPTZero can scan up to 5,000 characters for free, and claims to be 98% accurate. When we scanned WriteHuman’s content on it, the tool backed it up.
AI Score : Only 2% of the content was considered as AI.
ZeroGPT is an excellent AI detector, allowing users to scan 15,000 characters worth of content for free. When we checked the humanized passage by WriteHuman on the platform, it gave a positive score.
The service declared that “Your Text is Human written”, and the rating was 0% AI GPT.
AI Score : None of the text was AI-written.
Writer offers a smooth interface and lets users scan up to 5000 words of content for free. You can also upload the document’s URL to the platform to check for AI.
We added WriteHuman’s text into the tool and got a 98% Human-Generated Content rating, which was pretty similar to ZeroGPT.
AI Score : only 2% of the content was rated AI.
Copyleaks lets you check which section of the entered passage is AI for free. It is fairly accurate, and the plans come at a reasonable price. It indicated that WriteHuman’s text was original.
AI Score : None of the content was declared AI by Copyleaks.
On Sapling, you can check AI without creating an account. It is handy and quite accurate. When we entered WriteHuman’s text into the detector, it declared 99.97% of the text as original.
AI Score : Only 0.3% of the content was declared Fake or AI.
ContentScale can also detect AI content for free. However, you can only scan 2500 characters worth of text without subscribing. In WriteHuman’s case, the platform did not give a definitive answer,
AI Score : The tool was uncertain about the results. It did highlight some sections as AI and others as original content.
You get 10 credits for free, which allows scanning a full article. When we entered the humanized text on Crossplag, it did not point out any text as AI. We got the ‘All Clear’.
AI Score : None of the entered content was declared AI by Crossplag.
Originality is a professional and highly accurate tool that checks AI in content. It does not offer any free plans, and you can purchase credits starting at $30 to scan the text. We tried WriteHuman’s humanized passage into the platform and received a positive rating.
AI Score : Originality did not detect AI in WriteHuman’s humanized text.
Winston was not lenient with WriteHuman’s text. It detected that about 86% of the passage was AI. Moreover, it pointed out that the readability score was abysmal, that it was difficult to read, and that it could only be best understood by university graduates.
AI Score : Winston detected that the text was only 14% human, and it was mainly AI.
The content we got via WriteHuman’s Humanizer tool was appropriate per the set parameters. There were no logical errors.
Moreover, there is a myth regarding these tools that they tend to manipulate the grammar and deliberately set up formatting issues to bypass AI detection. As shared earlier, it got a reasonable score on Grammarly, pointing out that the content was OK.
We set up different tones, such as Professional, casual, etc., as parameters for our content and received the expected results. However, the casual set-up had quite a few transition words, such as Moreover, Nevertheless, etc.
These changes were quite noticeable and made us understand how inserting these words managed to bypass AI detection. Besides, the word count was close to the AI content we entered.
There are several AI Humanizers that claim to bypass AI content. Still, only a handful of them are truly capable of maintaining quality.
For these reasons, customer reviews matter a lot when making the right choice. You can read through each individual’s experiences and relate them to your situation.
Unfortunately, WriteHuman’s customer feedback is non-existent. It has no presence on top sites like Trustpilot, G2, and Sitejabber. So, there is no way of knowing whether this service is truly worth the money.
However, you can review our assessment in the previous section and check how it has fared with the different AI detection tools.
We have discussed the high and low points of WriteHuman here. This will help you decide whether this service is a good fit or not.
The service comes with several advantages and disadvantages as well. Check them out here.
Despite its several advantages, WriteHuman is not perfect. There are quite a few limitations associated with this tool, which can make humanizing the content inconvenient and time-consuming.
Inaccurate AI Detector
The built-in AI detection feature did not provide accurate results. We scanned content generated via ChatGPT 4o on the platform and received an 80% original rating. It implied that the content was human-written, but in reality, it was written by the GPT model.
Enhanced Model Inaccessibility
The free version does not have access to the Enhanced Model, so there is no way for users to test it. You would have to trust WriteHuman at their word that this mode is truly capable of bypassing the most strict AI detection tools.
This section will address your concerns and queries related to WriteHuman.
Yes, the service is legit, with a straightforward Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
WriteHuman does offer a free version, but you can submit only three requests per month, and the maximum word limit is 200 words each.
Its paid plans consist of three packages:
Basic
Pro
Ultra
WriteHuman offers an intuitive interface, and its humanizer tool helped bypass several AI detection tools. We scanned content generated by ChatGPT 4o, Gemini, ChatArt Pro, and others, and WriteHuman still gave them a positive score.
Still, we found its AI detector to be highly inaccurate. Moreover, the customer reviews on this tool were non-existent. If you wish to use a reliable content humanizer tool that can bypass all AI detectors, then try out TextGo.
Turnitin is among the strict AI detection tools, and WriteHuman was able to bypass it with flying colors.
Though there are no user reviews online to confirm that it is safe, we did create an account on the service and scanned our content using its features without any issues.
Plus, according to WriteHuman, it maintains your anonymity and safeguards your online privacy.
Just Google WriteHuman Promo Codes and you will find several results on the SERP. Click on the web pages and copy the codes you can apply while purchasing the tool.
WriteHuman, despite its many advantages, is not the ideal AI humanizer tool. Even if you pay for the service, you are only allowed a specific number of requests per month. So, if you wish to manage bulks of content without any hassle, then we suggest opting for a better alternative, such as TextGo AI.
This tool is user-friendly, offers flexible pricing plans, and creates logical, error-free content.
TextGo is a complete tool to bypass AI detection while keeping the content’s integrity in terms of logic, formatting, and grammar intact. Here are the top features of TextGo AI.
Here is a quick overview of how TextGo AI is better than WriteHuman!
| Tools | TextGo AI | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Free Version |  |
|
| Words per Process | 5000 words | 200 only and limited to paid versions |
| Instant AI Detection | |
- |
| 100% Undetectable | |
- |
| Plagiarism Free | |
|
| Language Support | More than 80 | English only |
We took the same ChatGPT content used to test WriteHuman and add it to TextGo AI. Once it humanized the passage, we scanned it on multiple platforms for AI detection.
Here are the results we recorded.
Turnitin gave a positive score to TextGo’s humanized passage. Not a single sentence or paragraph was flagged as AI-written.
GPTZero detected only 2% AI in TextGo’s content. It was below WriteHuman’s score, but still an effective result.
AI Score : 2% of the content was considered AI, which was a passable score.
ZeroGPT declared TextGo’s content as completely original, with a 0% AI GPT score.
AI Score : 0% of the content was AI.
Content generated by TextGo received a 91% original score, which was an excellent result given the strict nature of Writer’s AI detection tool. WriteHuman scored a bit better (98%), but the ratings were nearly identical.
AI Score : 9% of the entered text was AI.
Copyleaks spotted not a single word of AI content in the passage crafted by TextGo. The entire content received the green signal that it was written by a human.
We added the content humanized by Sapling and received a green flag that it was entirely original and AI-free.
AI Score : Sapling did not detect any AI in the content generated by TextGo AI.
We added TextGo’s content on this platform and got a positive result.
AI Score : The tool declared that the entire content Passed as Human.
Crossplag offers an AI Content Index, which lets you know how much of the text is original or AI-generated. In TextGo’s case, the entire passage was declared human-written.
AI Score : The tool declared the entire content as Human.
Originality thoroughly checks each text to spot traces of AI, which generally takes time. In TextGo’s case, this tool didn’t detect AI in the passage.
Winston declared that TextGo’s content was ‘Unlikely AI-generated’. It proved that the human-generated content was superior to WriteHuman’s.
AI Score : The whole text was rated original by Winston AI.
TextGo offers a proper user experience. Once you input the GPT content on the interface to humanize it, it will provide the AI score of both texts, which saves time and effort. With WriteHuman, you have to separately access the AI Detector web page and then paste the content to get the results.
TextGo’s default mode is the most advanced one and is available to all users. On the other hand, WriteHuman’s Enhanced Model is only accessible to paid customers.
Here is our verdict on the WriteHuman tool and whether it is a suitable option to humanize content.
WriteHuman offers relatively cheaper pricing plans, but there is a catch. Even with the paid packages, you can humanize a specific number of words and enter limited requests per month.
These are not ideal for professional users who run a blog or students who want to manage their assignments and research work hassle-free. Also, this tool’s AI detector shared disappointing results, making it an unreliable choice. TextGo AI is more suited for professionals and offers better plans to manage content without worrying about monthly requests running out.
If you require to bypass the most advanced AI detection tools like Originality AI 3.0, then WriteHuman’s Enhanced Model might benefit you.
Plus, it only lets you manage a specific amount of content, so if you do not manage texts in bulk and are required to humanize a limited number of passages, then WriteHuman is cost-effective and convenient.
However, for academic writing and blogging, where accurate, error-free, and logical content is required, WriteHuman is not an ideal choice. In such scenarios, we recommend opting for TextGo AI.
This concludes the WriteHuman reviews.
It offered great results regarding bypassing AI detection. Still, its pricing plans are not suited for long-term users, and the inaccuracies related to the AI detector were not something to be ignored.
For a hassle-free experience at cost-effective pricing, there is no better choice than TextGo.